Chartered Accountants Given Special Provisions Under Swiss Deal
ACCOUNTANTS who are members of professional body are given specific statutory provisions under the UK-Swiss agreement, which was signed yesterday.
The deal gives UK residents with Swiss accounts the choice of making a full disclosure to HMRC or paying a one-off levy on the capital in their account and a withholding tax on future income.
It also allows specific provisions for non-UK domiciled taxpayers. These individuals can receive certification so they will not pay tax on unremitted money to the UK, assuming they are not liable to taxation on this money in the UK.
Article 4 of the agreement states that this certification can be given by "a lawyer, an accountant or a tax adviser who is a member of a relevant professional body".
John Whiting, tax director at the CIoT, says that there has been specific statutory provisions for members of accountancy professional bodies, but it does represent a step forward.
"If you go back a few years, when it came appearing in front of a Revenue general commissioner, it did mention an individual could be represented by lawyer of ‘member of an incorporated society of accountants'," he said. "It was eventually modernised by getting rid of the whole provision and allowing individuals to be represented by anyone."
However, the provision in yesterday's agreement is significant in two ways, he added. "First, it allows for certification of non-doms by professionals, but many would argue that HMRC should do this.
"Secondly, this recognises tax professionals as a separate profession. This is good and proper.
Ian Young, tax faculty technical manager at ICAEW, said that relevant professional bodies were mentioned as part of anti-money laundering provisions.
The Swiss provision is not a step forward, he added. "It is just a useful way of giving reassurance to the authorities over a statement of fact - namely, whether an individual is named as a non-dom on their tax return."
Sean Wakeman, tax investigations partner at Crowe Clark Whitehill, warned that the provision could sideline tax investigations specialists who are ex-Revenue.
- ACCA Releases New Report Analysing the Impact of Recent Changes Made to Auditor Reporting Standards
- CIPFA Recognition Revoked as an Audit Qualifying Body
- EY Found Guilty of Misconduct in the Audit of Tech Data
- BDO Replaces Deloitte as Mitie Auditor
- Sasfin Holdings End their 18-year Relationship with KPMG amid Gupta Scandal
- Federal Court of Canada Rules in Favor of taxpayer in transfer pricing tax Case
- BHP Billiton Appoints EY as its New External Auditor