CNX Midstream Partners LP (CNXM) Financial Analysis and Rating

Comparison Analysis Based on SEC Data

Company Name CNX Midstream Partners LP
Industry (SIC) 4922 - Natural Gas Transmission
Revenue in 2019 $305,797 thousand (ranked #128 out of 157 companies in the industry)
Assets as of 12/31/2019 $1,235 million (ranked #128)
Fiscal Year End December 31
Analyzed report 6/30/2019 (filed 7/30/2019)

Year:

Financial Position and Performance

Compared with Q2 2019 industry ratios Change during the quarter

better

deteriorated
Compared with all listed companies

about the same

Compare with a competitor

Financial Ratios Benchmarking

Finanancial Ratio Comparison of 6/30/2019 company ratios
with Q2 2019 industry ratios
(49 - Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services)
with all listed companies
Solvency Ratios
Debt ratio 
0.62
0.64
0.62
0.63
Debt-to-equity ratio 
1.65
1.75
1.65
0.94
Interest coverage ratio 
6.05
2.43
6.05
1.83
Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio 
0.39
0.76
0.39
1.53
Quick Ratio 
0.37
0.44
0.37
0.99
Cash Ratio 
0.12
0.05
0.12
0.39
Profitability Ratios
Profit margin 
59.9%
6.8%
59.9%
3.1%
ROE (Return on equity), after tax 
45.1%
6%
45.1%
-0.6%
ROA (Return on assets) 
17.6%
2%
17.6%
0.6%
Activity Ratios
Asset turnover (days) 
1245
1653
1245
732
Receivables turnover (days) 
30
44
30
50
Resulting score +1,0 +0,1

Year:

Additional Ratios (not used in score calculation)

Finanancial Ratio Comparison of 6/30/2019 company ratios
with Q2 2019 industry ratios
(49 - Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services)
with all listed companies
Profitability Ratios
Gross margin 
68.7%
36.8%
68.7%
41.5%
Operating margin (Return on sales) 
59.5%
16.4%
59.5%
8.1%
Activity Ratios
EBIT  $46M
EBITDA  $52M

Auditor's Conclusion

We have performed a comparative analysis of the balance sheet and income statement of CNX Midstream Partners LP (hereafter – the "Company") for Q2 2019 as submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The primary business activity of the Company is "Natural Gas Transmission" (SIC code 4922). In the analysis, we have compared the key financial ratios of the Company with the average (median) values of those ratios calculated for the specific industry sector and for all companies. The averages are calculated using data from Q2 2019 financial statements filed with the SEC through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR). By comparing each of the eleven key metrics to the median, we have drawn a general conclusion about the quality of the company's financial condition. Calculations and summary conclusions are performed in a computerized manner using software and methodologies developed by ReadyRatios.

As a result of the analysis of the key financial ratios of the Company, we have established the following. The financial condition of CNX Midstream Partners LP in 2019 is better than the financial condition of half of all companies engaged in the activity "Natural Gas Transmission".

The average ratios for this industry are below the average for all companies. For this reason, the Company has a lower result compared to all businesses. The financial position of CNX Midstream Partners LP is about the same as the average financial condition of the listed companies that submit financial statements to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Financial Position and Performance History


More on CNX Midstream Partners LP

Closest Competitors

Company USD ($), in Millions
Revenue Assets
Rattler Midstream LP 448 1,636
Summit Midstream Partners, LP 444 2,573
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC 148 13,319
Altus Midstream Company 136 1,501

See all industry leaders

Financial Data Source and Analysis Principles

The above is a comparative analysis of the company's financial position and performance. The comparison is based on official financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) (about 10,000 largest publicly traded companies). The comparison is made using the eleven key financial ratios (see the table above). The company's financial ratios are compared with the median of the ratios for all companies and for companies in the same industry, as well as to the quartiles of these ratios. Each ratio value is assigned a score between -2 and +2 depending on its position relative to the quartiles (-2 – below the first quartile; -1 – between the first and the second quartile; +1 – between the second and the third quartile; +2 – above the third quartile; 0 – the ratio value deviates from the median by no more than 5% of the difference between the median and the quartile closest to the ratio value). To draw a conclusion from the analysis, the individual scores are weighted equally to produce an overall score ranging from -2 and +2.

much better (+1 - +2incl)
better (from 0.11 to +1incl)
about the same (from -0.11incl to +0.11incl)
worse (from -1incl to -0.11)
much worse (from -2incl to -1)
"Change during the year" calculation

Change during the year is calculated by comparing the resulting score of financial position within the industry with the last year's (quarter's) score. The result of the comparison may be as follows:

significantly improved (positive change of more than 1 point)
improved (positive change of less than 1 point)
unchanged (little or no change in score, no more than 0.11 points)
deteriorated (the score has decreased by less than 1 point during the year)
deteriorated significantly (the score has decreased by more than 1 point during the year)


Please note that this analysis does not indicate that the company's financial position is good or bad, but rather describes it in comparison to other U.S. businesses. For a detailed financial analysis, please use "ReadyRatios Financial Analysis" - load the data into the program>>

Login to ReadyRatios

 

Have you forgotten your password?

Are you a new user?

Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services: