Still calculating financial ratios manually?
Stop wasting time — let the computer do it!
SUPA Consolidated Inc. (SFCX) Financial Analysis and Rating
Comparison Analysis Based on SEC Data
| Company Name | SUPA Consolidated Inc. |
| Industry (SIC) | 7389 - Business Services, Not Elsewhere Classified |
| Assets as of 12/31/2025 | $5,151 thousand |
| Analyzed report | 12/31/2015 (filed 3/30/2016) |
Year:
Financial Position and Performance
| Compared with 2015 industry ratios | Change during the year |
|---|---|
|
much better |
significantly improved |
| Compared with all listed companies |
|---|
|
much better |
Financial Ratios Benchmarking
| Financial Ratio | Comparison of company ratios for 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
with industry ratios (73 - Business Services) |
with all listed companies | ||
| Solvency Ratios | |||
| Debt ratio |
0.23
0.64
|
0.23
0.66
|
|
| Debt-to-equity ratio |
0.30
0.44
|
0.30
0.67
|
|
| Liquidity Ratios | |||
| Current Ratio |
4.30
1.23
|
4.30
1.53
|
|
| Cash Ratio |
4.06
0.43
|
4.06
0.39
|
|
| Profitability Ratios | |||
| Profit margin |
7.2%
-3.6%
|
7.2%
1.9%
|
|
| ROE (Return on equity), after tax |
10.9%
-27.5%
|
10.9%
-4.1%
|
|
| ROA (Return on assets) |
5.4%
-6.2%
|
5.4%
-0.1%
|
|
| Activity Ratios | |||
| Asset turnover (days) |
488
493
|
488
633
|
|
| Resulting score | +1,6 | +1,6 | |
Auditor's Conclusion
We have performed a comparative analysis of the balance sheet and income statement of SUPA Consolidated Inc. (hereafter – the "Company") for the year 2015 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The primary business activity of the Company is "Business Services, Not Elsewhere Classified" (SIC code 7389). In our analysis, we compared the key financial ratios of the Company with the average (median) values of those ratios calculated for the Company's specific industry sector and for all companies. The averages were calculated using data from 2015 financial statements filed with the SEC through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR). By comparing each of the eleven key metrics to the median, we have reached an overall conclusion about the quality of the Company's financial condition. All calculations and conclusions were performed using software and methodologies developed by ReadyRatios.
Based on our analysis of the Company's key financial ratios, we have determined the following. The financial condition of SUPA Consolidated Inc. in 2015 is much better than the typical financial condition of companies in the "Business Services, Not Elsewhere Classified" industry.
The same conclusion can be reached when comparing the Company's ratios to the averages for all U.S. industries. The financial position of SUPA Consolidated Inc. is much better than that of most listed companies that file financial statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
More on SUPA Consolidated Inc.
Closest Competitors
| Company | USD ($), in Millions | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Assets | |
| Outdoor Holding Co | (18) | 272 |
| Oculus Visiontech Inc | 0 | |
| XBP Global Holdings, Inc. | 902 | |
| LIMITLESS PROJECTS INC. | 0 | |
Financial Data Source and Analysis Principles
The above is a comparative analysis of the company's financial position and performance. The comparison is based on official financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) (about 10,000 largest publicly traded companies). The comparison is made using the eleven key financial ratios (see the table above). The company's financial ratios are compared with the median of the ratios for all companies and for companies in the same industry, as well as to the quartiles of these ratios. Each ratio value is assigned a score between -2 and +2 depending on its position relative to the quartiles (-2 – below the first quartile; -1 – between the first and the second quartile; +1 – between the second and the third quartile; +2 – above the third quartile; 0 – the ratio value deviates from the median by no more than 5% of the difference between the median and the quartile closest to the ratio value). To draw a conclusion from the analysis, the individual scores are weighted equally to produce an overall score ranging from -2 and +2.
| much better (+1 - +2incl) | |
| better (from 0.11 to +1incl) | |
| about the same (from -0.11incl to +0.11incl) | |
| worse (from -1incl to -0.11 |