Jingbo Technology, Inc. (SVMB) Financial Analysis and Rating
Comparison Analysis Based on SEC Data
Company Name | Jingbo Technology, Inc. |
Industry (SIC) | 7372 - Prepackaged Software |
Revenue in 2023 (TTM) | $3,024 thousand (ranked #499 out of 565 companies in the industry) |
Assets as of 11/30/2023 | $12,421 thousand (ranked #469) |
Analyzed report | 5/31/2023 (filed 10/02/2023) |
Year:
Financial Position and Performance Annual | Quarterly
Compared with Q2 2023 industry ratios | Change during the quarter |
---|---|
much worse |
deteriorated |
Compared with all listed companies |
---|
much worse |
Financial Ratios Benchmarking
Finanancial Ratio | Comparison of 5/31/2023 company ratios | ||
---|---|---|---|
with Q2 2023 industry ratios (73 - Business Services) |
with all listed companies | ||
Solvency Ratios | |||
Debt ratio |
2.86
0.60
|
2.86
0.61
|
|
Liquidity Ratios | |||
Current Ratio |
0.80
1.42
|
0.80
1.70
|
|
Quick Ratio |
0.21
1.13
|
0.21
1.02
|
|
Cash Ratio |
0.12
0.61
|
0.12
0.49
|
|
Profitability Ratios | |||
Profit margin |
-203.8%
-5.4%
|
-203.8%
2.4%
|
|
ROA (Return on assets) |
-66%
-3%
|
-66%
0.8%
|
|
Activity Ratios | |||
Asset turnover (days) |
1128
591
|
1128
757
|
|
Receivables turnover (days) |
49
56
|
49
48
|
|
Resulting score | -1,6 | -1,6 |
Year:
Additional Ratios (not used in score calculation)
Finanancial Ratio | Comparison of 5/31/2023 company ratios | ||
---|---|---|---|
with Q2 2023 industry ratios (73 - Business Services) |
with all listed companies | ||
Profitability Ratios | |||
Gross margin |
4.4%
56.4%
|
4.4%
39.6%
|
|
Activity Ratios | |||
Inventory turnover (days) |
13
32
|
13
92
|
Auditor's Conclusion
We have performed a comparative analysis of the balance sheet and income statement of Jingbo Technology, Inc. (hereafter – the "Company") for Q2 2023 as submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The primary business activity of the Company is "Prepackaged Software" (SIC code 7372). In the analysis, we have compared the key financial ratios of the Company with the average (median) values of those ratios calculated for the specific industry sector and for all companies. The averages are calculated using data from Q2 2023 financial statements filed with the SEC through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR). By comparing each of the eleven key metrics to the median, we have drawn a general conclusion about the quality of the company's financial condition. Calculations and summary conclusions are performed in a computerized manner using software and methodologies developed by ReadyRatios.
As a result of the analysis of the key financial ratios of the Company, we have established the following. The financial condition of Jingbo Technology, Inc. in 2023 is much worse than the financial condition of half of all companies engaged in the activity "Prepackaged Software".
This conclusion is supported by a comparison of the Company's financial ratios with average U.S. ratios. The financial position of Jingbo Technology, Inc. is much worse than that of most listed companies that submit financial statements to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Financial Position and Performance History
More on Jingbo Technology, Inc.
Closest Competitors
Company | USD ($), in Millions | |
---|---|---|
Revenue | Assets | |
T Stamp Inc. | 5 | 8 |
Destiny Media Technologies Inc | 4 | 4 |
Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. | 3 | 1 |
Freeze Tag, Inc. | 2 | 1 |
Financial Data Source and Analysis Principles
The above is a comparative analysis of the company's financial position and performance. The comparison is based on official financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) (about 10,000 largest publicly traded companies). The comparison is made using the eleven key financial ratios (see the table above). The company's financial ratios are compared with the median of the ratios for all companies and for companies in the same industry, as well as to the quartiles of these ratios. Each ratio value is assigned a score between -2 and +2 depending on its position relative to the quartiles (-2 – below the first quartile; -1 – between the first and the second quartile; +1 – between the second and the third quartile; +2 – above the third quartile; 0 – the ratio value deviates from the median by no more than 5% of the difference between the median and the quartile closest to the ratio value). To draw a conclusion from the analysis, the individual scores are weighted equally to produce an overall score ranging from -2 and +2.
much better (+1 - +2incl) | |
better (from 0.11 to +1incl) | |
about the same (from -0.11incl to +0.11incl) | |
worse (from -1incl to -0.11) | |
much worse (from -2incl to -1) |
Change during the year is calculated by comparing the resulting score of financial position within the industry with the last year's (quarter's) score. The result of the comparison may be as follows:
significantly improved (positive change of more than 1 point) | |
improved (positive change of less than 1 point) | |
unchanged (little or no change in score, no more than 0.11 points) | |
deteriorated (the score has decreased by less than 1 point during the year) | |
deteriorated significantly (the score has decreased by more than 1 point during the year) |
Please note that this analysis does not indicate that the company's financial position is good or bad, but rather describes it in comparison to other U.S. businesses. For a detailed financial analysis, please use "ReadyRatios Financial Analysis" - load the data into the program>>